To Commercialize IoT, Embrace the Venture Structure
Peer InsightPeer Insight
The technology that enables IoT has improved by leaps and bounds over the past 15 years. The commercialization methods, by contrast, haven’t changed much. Here’s a good start: Structure your IoT initiative as an entrepreneurial venture. This allows you to experiment, tweak and pivot until you reach product-market fit. Â
John Seely Brown, the renowned Xerox PARC Chief Scientist, may have said it best:
The first step to winning that struggle is to set the IoT project up as a venture. My first IoT platform was created in 2000, when I was CEO of a startup venture named Brivo Systems. I’ve worked on more than a dozen IoT solutions since then, mostly within large enterprises. The technical components have improved dramatically over the past 15+ years, e.g., the Cloud, service-oriented architecture, and modular software – not to mention cheap sensors.“Sometimes we must work particularly hard to find the architecture of the revenues. This struggle is as valuable as inventing the technology itself.”
The IoT commercialization challenge, by contrast, remains unchanged. The formula I followed in 2000 still guides us today: find a first Applications that is good enough, find a revenue model that pays just enough, then tweak ... tweak again... and build towards product-market fit.
In many ways, finding the revenue mechanics for IoT still requires building the plane while you’re flying it. However, while there are no real shortcuts to commercialization, it is still possible to take the long way, or even the wrong way.
Lean startup entrepreneur Steve Blank defined a venture as follows:
That’s the perfect attitude – and governance structure – for an IoT program. Sounds great, you say, but can large enterprises really do this? More and more, the answer is a resounding “Yes.” From Georgia Pacific to Masco Coatings to Nike, corporate “ventures” are becoming more commonplace. These ventures are wired for sprints and in-market experiments; they are inherently more agile and resource efficient.“Venture: A temporary organization formed to search for a scalable business model.”
Here is a simple way to contrast Business as Usual with a Venture structure:
Core Business as Usual | Venture | |
Large, part-time project team | vs. | Small, full-time team |
Focus on a specific technical solution | vs. | Focus on a specific customer problem |
Progress thru proving the technology | vs. | Progress thru testing the assumptions |
Annual budget; re-load assumed | vs. | Milestone budget; zero-based budget assumed |
Quarterly decision committee, >7 people | vs. | On-demand decision team, <4 people |
Quantitative hurdle decision-making | vs. | Directional evidence decision-making |
Take a minute and rate your IoT program structure and governance framework using these criteria. The more you plot your marker toward the right-hand side, the greater your chance for commercial success. Ventures flex. They feel their way. And they fight for traction.
The temporary mentality is crucial. Ventures are built for rapid exploration and affordable pivots. Whether they exist as small startups or within large enterprises, ventures are characterized by:
Written by Tim Ogilvie, Founder at Peer Insight Ventures
New Podcast Episode
Recent Articles